<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back Links Analyzed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/</link>
	<description>Hospitality Industry Internet Markting Blog from Blizzard Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katie White</title>
		<link>http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 15:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>In response to Stephan - I disagree completely that meta tags do not make a difference in free listing placement. This is untrue - and the title otherwise known as "Meta tag title" is part of the meta tag. I recommend that Stephan test his own strategies to see what works and what does not work. I am sure he will find that meta tags make a huge difference in free listing placement. 

And again - there are many different things that contribute the free listings placement... 

Katie White</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Stephan - I disagree completely that meta tags do not make a difference in free listing placement. This is untrue - and the title otherwise known as &#8220;Meta tag title&#8221; is part of the meta tag. I recommend that Stephan test his own strategies to see what works and what does not work. I am sure he will find that meta tags make a huge difference in free listing placement. </p>
<p>And again - there are many different things that contribute the free listings placement&#8230; </p>
<p>Katie White</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Scherman, The B&#38;B Team</title>
		<link>http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-3277</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Scherman, The B&#38;B Team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 14:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-3277</guid>
		<description>After some of what I learned at the PAII conference, I made some changes to the title tag and anchor text on a few select pages of our website. Within a few days, the organic ranking of our site improved with the search terms we were looking to score well with. I'm a total novice, but I'm also now a believer and will spend more time studying and implementing some simple strategies that obviously pay off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After some of what I learned at the PAII conference, I made some changes to the title tag and anchor text on a few select pages of our website. Within a few days, the organic ranking of our site improved with the search terms we were looking to score well with. I&#8217;m a total novice, but I&#8217;m also now a believer and will spend more time studying and implementing some simple strategies that obviously pay off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Spencer</title>
		<link>http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 06:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>Meta tags don't improve rankings, unless you are considering the title tag a meta tag.

Also, I'd put anchor text at the top of the list of factors that affect free listing placement.

Stephan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meta tags don&#8217;t improve rankings, unless you are considering the title tag a meta tag.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;d put anchor text at the top of the list of factors that affect free listing placement.</p>
<p>Stephan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Blizzard</title>
		<link>http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-2793</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Blizzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 01:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-2793</guid>
		<description>I vote for the quality links from quality websites.  They deliver qualified traffic and if chosen wisely, deliver an excellent ROI on their own... the Google advantage is a bonus.

Also, "meta tags" is a word we should probably define... technically, it includes meta keywords (a small factor) and meta description (more important for converting an impression to a click).  On-site optimization might be a better term because it includes (technically) title, h1, keyword density, html code and other on page elements that are not necessarily part of "meta tags."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I vote for the quality links from quality websites.  They deliver qualified traffic and if chosen wisely, deliver an excellent ROI on their own&#8230; the Google advantage is a bonus.</p>
<p>Also, &#8220;meta tags&#8221; is a word we should probably define&#8230; technically, it includes meta keywords (a small factor) and meta description (more important for converting an impression to a click).  On-site optimization might be a better term because it includes (technically) title, h1, keyword density, html code and other on page elements that are not necessarily part of &#8220;meta tags.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Bowling</title>
		<link>http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-2777</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Bowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 15:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/back-links-analyzed/2006/05/02/#comment-2777</guid>
		<description>In the past, the quantity of links to a website was of utmost importance. The spammers manipulated the backlink aspect of the algorithms so much that the search engines have become much more discriminating. Now, the quality of links is much more important than the quantity and poor quality links can actually hurt your organic rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past, the quantity of links to a website was of utmost importance. The spammers manipulated the backlink aspect of the algorithms so much that the search engines have become much more discriminating. Now, the quality of links is much more important than the quantity and poor quality links can actually hurt your organic rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
